The Proving of X-ray

A very able description of the discovery of the X Ray by Professor Roentgen was given in the Homeopathic Physician (March 1896) by our vice-president, Dr. Walter M. James, and concluded with the words: "Why should not the homeopathist seek to procure a proving of the effects of the X Ray upon the animal economy of the human being? An inviting field is there opened up to the experimenters of our school. May it soon be cultivated!" Why not?

1897. March 27. A drachm vial filled with absolute alcohol was exposed to a Crook's tube in operation for half an hour, and then brought up to the sixth centesimal potency. With this smallest globules were moistened and the vials containing them presented to the members of the Brooklyn Hahnemannian Union, which met the same evening in regular session.

Of course everyone was curious of trying the new remedy and took a small number of globules on the tongue at once, and lo! it began to reveal its existence immediately, and during the two hours of our being together a number of symptoms were observed, which were at once announced and taken down by our diligent Secretary. Some of the members from that time have been so seriously affected, that they would not for any consideration try any more of that mysterious power. The following is a narrative of its action upon the several provers, being perfectly healthy up to that time, which lasted from the beginning to two months. The action reveals not only new symptoms, but also hunted up many old ones, which called forth the remark of Dr. John B. Campbell, "I noticed a grand characteristic in all the provings as far as heard from, viz., a tendency to resurrect old symptoms, some unheard of for as much as thirty years, some twenty, or a year or two."

If it is assumed that glass is opaque to the X ray, it was not so in our case, for the alcohol in the vial was certainly affected by it, as the result of the provings show. If the X ray penetrates certain tissues of the body in order to make the condition of the opaque organs, such as the bones and foreign bodies contained in the body, visible, it also shows its penetration into that invisible interior of the human being, which is under the dominion of the life-force.

But oh ! where is the bacillus ?


 Provings Of The X Ray With One Dose Of The Sixth Cent. Potency.


1. Dr. B. L' B. B. After one dose X ray 6 cent.
A magnetic thrill in right hand extending up forearm, immediately.
No particular symptoms the next day.
Next morning awaked earlier than usual by dull aching in the left side of occiput, and immediately in left sacro-liliac region, then on posterior aspect of left thigh and calf, a dull ache. These pains extended from above downward, not severe, lasting fifteen minutes.
In afternoon suddenly a sharp ache in left side of occiput on a small area. This occurred two or three times at intervals of some hours without regularity.
After that in the course of two or three days a trouble which he had once before, a catarrhal condition of inflammation of rectum with discharge of mucus, slightly bloody, after action of bowels.
Corns on soles of feet more sensitive than formerly consisting of thickening of cuticle, and sometimes a little pinhead depression in the middle which does not scale off.

2. Dr. Mrs. Alice B. C. after one dose X ray 6 cent.
A feeling on the external orbital margin as if it might be an ache, immediately.
Buzzing in right ear with pressure extending to temples.
Bearing down of eyelids.
Woke with headache next morning, continuing at intervals during whole day.
A pressing across forehead, with a miserable feeling generally as though going to be sick.
Sleepy with headache.
Bloody mucus from nose.
No appetite for anything only sweet pudding or cake most tolerable.
Aversion to meat.
Heaviness and fullness in lower abdomen after eating small quantity.
Uneasy feeling in lower abdomen at intervals like fomention, as though diarrhcea would follow.
Most distress after midday and evening meal.
Abdomen distended with full feeling.
(Pulsatilla, which a year ago helped for months a train of symptoms, had only very slight effect.)
Drawing gnawing in the region of appendix as though inflammation were beginning.
Sensation in right lower abdomen as though bubbles were forming and wanting to burst (relieved by Taraxacum for twenty-four hours).
Flatulence with ineffectual desire for stool.
Seven days after taking the medicine was roused out of bed at 4 a.m. with desire for stool, and complete evacuation of immense quantity followed by nausea and vomiting, profuse sweat.
Colicky pain in right lower abdomen, sometimes extending behind hip, and retained urine.
Tenesmus vesicae continuing for twelve hours to 4 p.m., when the urine came freer.
Vomiting ceased though colic-pains remained for twelve days.
Moving aggravated pains especially on right side of abdomen, which seemed to adhere to the walls, feeling as if being torn off. Had to keep a large towel-pad between abdomen and thigh to support abdomen and prevent the excruciating pain.
Ate nothing for three days.
Thirst for cold drinks though nothing tastes good.
Tongue thickly coated.
Breath foul.
Only snatches of sleep during these twelve days, always followed by terrible mental depression, did not want to answer questions, did not want to see anybody nor to speak to anybody; misanthropy.
Chills as soon as beginning to sleep running up back, preventing sleep.
Dreams of distressing nature. Recurrence of a dream that used to trouble many years ago. This dream was repeated at wide intervals over twenty years ago. Now it came every night for five times.
Seven days from beginning of the attack had a return of renal colic with vomiting, continuous nausea, cold sweat and retention of urine on left side. A clutching pain from kidney to bladder that never relaxed for four hours, causing the wildest demonstrations of agony, ghastly face, blue rings around sunken eyes, violent trembling, frightful restlessness, cold sweat, urine retained in ureter, giving a perfect picture of Tabacum which also relieved the symptoms. As soon as the pains in the ureter relaxed, the urine seemed to fill up the bladder and then passed without pain. Some spasm remained and was relieved by Cantharis in five minutes. (She had something like this before, about a year ago, by all means not so severe, a mere strangury).
Varicose veins inside of knees and legs, with swelling and soreness (after years returned).
The palms of hands, which were rough and scaly and bleeding at times, became entirely smooth during proving. Healing action. After that the hands went back to former condition while general health improved.
Prostration for a long time.
During the continued action of the X ray she suffered so much that for some time she had to take medicine to counteract it. All these symptoms have been thrown out.

3. Dr. John B. C. 1897, March 28th, took X ray 6 cent. three doses in globules ten minutes apart.
Five minutes after second dose.
Sensation of fullness of head with slight full feeling in both ears, worse in right ear.
Feeling in head and nose as if coryza were about to commence, with some slight desire to sneeze.
Sense of pressive fullness starting from posterior prominence of vertex in a straight line to bridge of nose, followed by fullness in entire vertex extending to bridge of nose.
Tingling in both arms as of an electric current, or as if asleep.
Intermittent, slightly burning rheumatic-like pain in right carpometacarpal articulation extending from index finger up outside of forearm.
Aggravation of fullness over vertex worse along centre to nose, worse stooping.
Dull pain in right sciatic nerve, worse on walking.
Wandering pains in chest, sticking in character, worse on right side.
Sticking pains in different parts of head and face.
Rheumatic pains in different parts of head and face.
Rheumatic pains in front of right thigh.
March 29th. Bad taste in forenoon.
Disagreeable fullness of head all morning, with bland coryza and stoppage of nostrils.
General tired and sick feeling.
Symptoms gradually increasing in severity after noon.
Headache gradually extending to frontal region, worse in centre of forehead.
Sense of pressure in centre of forehead.
Dull headache in morning, worse stooping and after rising.
Symptoms all intermittent in character, they have all returned.
Sensation of sulphur-vapor in nose, with much sneezing.
Aching pain across top of head, coronal suture, on blowing nose and after it.
Pain in dorsal region.
Sulphur-vapor sensation in throat and nose.
Intermittent noise as of deep steam whistle in left ear, and singing in head.
Mental processes not clear; writes wrong words in letters.
Stitching pain in right upper chest, going through to upper part of scapula.
Rheumatic pain in left wrist and forearm.
Lame and stiff in back.
Aching whole length of spine.
Chilly while undressing in warm room.
March 30. Constant ache in vertex, worse on waking, also worse coughing, sneezing, motion or head low.
Rheumatic twinge in last two phalangeal articulations of index and middle finger for a short time in forenoon Appetite diminished.
Nose stopped, worse on left side.
Throat painful on swallowing.
Sense of painful lump about left tonsil, worse swalowing.
Very vivid lewd dreams repeated night after night.
Dreams of strife, busy dreams.
Sleep not unrefreshing, though apparently dreaming all night.
Remark of the Prover. This medicine resurrects old troubles that have been long dormant, and remedies that formerly helped have little, if any, effect against the renewed difficulty. In five provers old symptoms were brought to light. In some cases the symptoms had been absent one year, some six, twelve or even thirty years.
May 24, No appetite for breakfast (an old symptom absent for years).
Re-appearance of an old slight pimply eruption on left side of forehead.
Persistent exhaustion and languor; this last was marked and not attributable to spring.
Return of a slight eruption on outside of lower legs, burning when scratched, worse after scratching (absent for months).
Observation of the Prover. It seems this medicine might be used in three ways: 1. To develop old troubles or those which might become latent from any cause including suppression; 2. To develop acute symptoms already present as against its own pathogenetic phenomena; 3. As an anti-psoric, somewhat like sulphur.

4. Dr. Miss C., March 27, 9 p.m. one dose X ray 6 cent.
An indescribable sensation in esophagus, immediately.
Pain in right side of head above temple.
Palpitation during evening, causing cough.
Pulsations greatly diffused and violent, provoking an exclamation which was repressed, accompanied with a desire to walk in open air, and entirely relieved by lying down.
Before going to sleep, dull pain in upper jaw on right side.
Scraping pain in lateral incisor, aggravated by noises and Jarring of cars.
March 28. After waking at daybreak next morning sensation in dorsal region of spine, as if its convexity were anterior and drawn far forward, lasting but a minute, and followed by a very uncomfortable feeling in that region lasting a much longer time.
In morning after rising and before eating, a cough caused by an irritation in larynx, accompanied by a pain in right side just above crest of ilium; eating relieved cough, but side felt bruised when bending, or jarring, or pressing it.
Red, smooth eruption on right side of face.
Sore pain in cartilage of left ear, felt when pressing it later in right ear.
March 29. Pain darting upward in region of left ovary, when sitting, walking or standing.
March 31. After eating at noon, a sensation of a long and narrow foreign body lodged in pharynx, unmoved by swallowing, aggravated by swallowing. After this passed away, pharynx felt hollow and sore on deglutition.
Sharp pain at apex of heart, better by lying on left side.
Had always heat and swelling of feet in spring which is better now. Healing action.

5. Dr. St. C. after one dose X ray 6 cent.
Threatening headache, pressure through telnples, immediately.
Aching of extensor muscle of forearm, going up to shoulder.

6. Mrs. E. C. after one dose X ray 6 cent.
Drawing, aching discomfort in right thigh through hip and knee down through toes, immediately.
Sciatic pain in right hip.
Palpitation of heart.
In less than a week began to cough, with tearing sensation in bronchi, hoarseness, palpitation.
Chilliness on moving or from draft.
Eyeballs sore.
Lame and sore all over.
Wave-like sensation as if would break out in perspiration.
Stools green though normal in consistency.
Teeth covered with a gray-green deposit.
Menses dark green one day.
Second day of menses violent sick headache, pulsating pressure outward in forehead as if bursting, vomiting, pain relieved by hot water application.
Phlegm of greenish hue causing cough in crawling up.

7. Dr. L. M. L. after one dose X ray 6 cent.
Drawing in and heaviness across brow approaching nose and resting there.
Ears more clear from ringing and from dullness of hearing than for many years. Healing action.
Rheumatic pains in right wrist and arm.
Headache across brow and a different pain in temples.
Eyelids feel sleepy and heavy.
Tingling like pins and needles in left hand.
Improvement of hearing continues;

8. Dr. F. H. L. after one dose X ray 6 cent.
Tingling in right hand, immediately.
Pain across brow over bridge of nose.

9. Dr. Miss R. after one dose X ray 6 cent.
Lower part of both legs asleep, tingling feeling as if from electric battery increased in right, immediately.
A feeling as if some one were drawing icy hands over the thigh downward, aggravatingly slow. (Return of an old symptom twelve years ago after a nervous shock which did not return for five years).
Three years ago proved Uranium nitrate. Up to that time had never missed a regular menstruation, but it has been irregular ever since. Had not menstruated or six months till after taking the X ray, when it was almost prostrating.
Three or four days previously felt from waist down as if bursting and wanting to hold herself up, with distention and weight in abdomen, relieved by flow, violent, profuse without pain. Flow lasting seven days.
Mental condition upset, felt as if she would like to kill somebody.
Heavy pressure on vertex as from a hand (old symptom absent a year).

10. Mr. Davis S. took one dose X ray 6 cent. 1897, March 28.
Next day mental irritability.
Trembling all over.
Body tired and exhausted.
Pain in right side of head passing around base of brain to left ear, followed by paralytic numbness.
Nervous.
Powerlessness in limbs.
Slightly sick at stomach.
A sensation of hypertesthesia or nervous concentration in bridge of nose.
Sore feeling across loins as after a heavy cold.
Fullness in ears, worse in right ear, worse by inserting finger.
Pressing outward in ears.
Sensation as of a cool drop of sweat going down left side of spine.
Sense of contraction across middle chest.
Chills going down back, followed by paralytic feeling in right cheek.
Muscles feel soft subjectively.
Tongue felt dry, rough, sore, scraped.
Soreness in small of back.
Sleepy and unable to sleep for some hours after retiring.
On rising in morning expectoration of considerable white mucus.
Generally worse in open air.
Nasal discharge thin.
Mentally irritable.
Headache and soreness worse toward afternoon.
Mental and physical aggravation markedly pronounce toward evening.
Bitter taste.
Pain in left temple, worse at 8 p.m.
Contraction of chest at night, relieved by belching.
Slight electric current sensation in left side of tongue and face, passing over and disappearing on right side of face at 8:25 p.m.
Much expectoration of tough lumps as large as finger ends, whitish like gelatine, raised easily.
At first had desire for sweets.
The sleeplessness, which was getting constant an troublesome, seemed to be relieved permanently by a bottle of Pabst Malt Extract.
May 1st. Drowsy at night when sitting up. Drowsiness leaves the instant he lies down, so he cannot sleep.
Reappearance of many symptoms which occured during an attack of inflammatory rheumatism, twenty-five years ago even to a Painful bulging of left. chest over the cardiac region.
Sensation in right eye as though bulging. Right eye sore to touch.
On closing eyes in dark sees old women's and men's ugly face.
A paralytic sensation extending from spine down left leg. Twitching internally in various parts of body.
All symptoms worse toward evening and at night.
On inside of left knee sensation in different spots, pasnful as if hairs were being pulled out, worse on wa ing, better on rubbing or scratching.
Sexual desire lost.
Raising of jelly-like mucus, worse in forenoon, tenacious and tough.
Grayish expectoration.
While lying on left side, heart-sounds keep him awake.
Goes to sleep on right but wakes on left side.
Symptoms worse on getting into bed, worse after sunset.
Profuse perspiration on getting into bed, keeping him awake.
Symptoms better after Bell. or Acon. for a short time, better from ale which puts him asleep.
Sleepy during day.
Waking frequently at night from no apparent cause.
Spells of feverishness, perspiration and weakness.
On straining at stool, a sore sensation in nates.
Rheumatic-like fever in trunk, pain steady and dull going steadily from trunk to legs and finally to heel; worse left knee, worse stepping on heel, on underside.
Head feels empty as though scraped out, worse at night in bed.
Can't hold things in left hand, being powerless or clumsy.
All symptoms worse in bed.
Third day after taking: Slight nose-bleed on left side at 4:30 p.m.
Sensation of swooning at times during day and night, feeling like dying.
Rheumatic pains in limbs. (all old symptoms of rheumatism resurrected even to an old soreness in heels).
Soreness worse in legs and arms and around heart, dull and constant.
No hunger, goes till he feels faint, can eat plenty, but does not enjoy it.
Frequent urination, worse after getting into bed.
Testes relaxed, impotent feeling.
Pressure in small of back as from congestion about kidneys.
Sharp stabbing pains in left temple, which staggered him, followed by clearing up of mental functions— the heart immediately felt this impulse.
Left chest bulged out (like enlargement of heart in old rheumatism twenty-five years ago).
A sensation in left side as if fingers pressed the costal cartilages in, followed by sensation as though something broke inside, with temporary relief.
Sensation of drops of water trickling down on inside of chest.
Wind around heart, flatus and flatulence as though diarrhcea would commence.
Unnatural lewd or disgusting dreams, occurring on several nights, or several times in one night.


SUMMARY

MIND AND DISPOSITION
Mental irritability.
Clearing up of mental function after sharp stabbing pain in left temple staggering him, the heart feeling the impulse, immediately.
Mental depression after snatches of sleep for twelve days.
Mental processes not clear, writes wrong words in letters.
Mental condition upset during profuse menstruation, would like to kill somebody.
Misanthropy during renal colic, did not want to answer questions, did not want to see anybody or to talk to anybody, being completely prostrated.

HEAD
A feeling at right external orbital margin as if it might be an ache, immediately (the first symptom observed).
A pressing across forehead with a miserable feeling generally as though going to be sick.
Awoke with headache next morning, continuing at intervals through whole day.
Sleepy with headache.
Headache gradually extending to frontal region, worse in centre of forehead.
Sense of pressure in centre of forehead.
Dull headache in morning, worse when stooping and after rising.
Headache and soreness, worse toward afternoon.
Head feels empty as though scraped, worse at night in bed.
Sensation of fullness of head with slight full feelhlg in ears, worse in right ear.
Pain in right side of head above temple.
Threatening headaches pressure through temples.
Headache across brow, and a different pain in temples.
Pain in right side of head, passing around base of brain to right ear, followed by paralytic numbness.
Pain in left temple, worse 8 p.m.
Sharp stabbing in left temple, followed by clearhlg up mental function, the heart immediately feeling the impulse.
Feeling in head and nose as if coryza would set hl, with slight desire to sneeze.
Sense of pressive fullness starting from posterior prominence of vertex in a central straight line to bridge of nose followed by fullness in entire vertex extending to bridge of nose.
Aggravation of fullness over vertex, worse along the centre to nose and when stooping over.
Disagreeable fullness of head all morning, with bland coryza and stoppage of nostrils.
Aching on top of head across along coronal suture on blowing nose and after it.
Constant ache in vertex, worse on awaking, also on coughing, sneezing, or head low.
Drawing in and across the brow approaching nose and resting there, immediately.
Pain across brow over bridge of nose.
Heavy pressure on vertex as from a hand (old symptom, absent a year).
Sticking pains in different parts of head and face.
Morning awakening earlier than usual with dull aching in left occiput, and immediately in left sacroiliac region, lasting fifteen minutes.
Suddensharp ache in left occiput on small area, recurring two or three times at intervals of some hours without regularity.
Violent sick headache second day of menses, pulsating pressure outward in forehead as if bursting, vomiting, pain relieved by hot water application.

EYES
Bearing down of eyelids.
Eyeballs sore.
Sensation in right eye as if bulging.
Right eye sore to touch.
Congestion of eyes in forenoon, worse on rising.
On closing eyes in dark sees old men's and women's ugly faces.
Eyelids heavy and sleepy.

EARS
Sore pain in cartilage of left ear when pressing it, later in right ear.
Pressing outward in ears.
Buzzing in right ear with pressure extending to temples.
Fullness in ears, worse in right ear, worse by inserting finger.
Fullness in ears, more right, and fullness in head.
Intermittent noise as of deep steam-whistle in left ear and ringing in head.
Ears more clear from ringing and dullness of hearing than for many years, an improvement lasting up to this day. Healing action.

NOSE
Bloody mucus from. nose.
Sensation of sulphur-vapor in nose with much sneezing.
Sulphur-vapor sensation in throat and nose.
Sensation in head and nose as before coryza.
Nose stopped on left side.
On blowing nose and after it aching across top of head along coronal suture.
Sensation of hyperaesthesia or nervous concentration in bridge of nose.
Nasal discharge thin.
Flowing coryza with stoppage of nostrils and fullness in head, forenoon.

FACE
Dull pain in right upper jaw.
Paralytic feeling in right cheek, preceded by chills going down back.
Slight electric current sensation in left side of tongue and face, passing over and disappearing in right side of face.
Red, smooth eruption on right side of face.
Stinging pains in different parts of head and face.

MOUTH
Tongue dry, rough, sore and scraped.
Scraping pain in lateral incisor, aggravated by noises and jarring of cars.
Teeth covered with a gray-green deposit.
Tongue slightly coated.

THROAT
Sulphur-vapor sensation in nose and throat.
Throat painful on swallowing.
Sense of painful lump about left tonsil, worse swallowing.
Indescribable sensation in esophagus, immediately.
Foul breath.
After eating at noon, sensation of a long and narrow foreign body lodged in pharynx, removed by swallowing, aggravated by swallowing. After this passed away, pharynx felt hollow and sore on deglutition.

APPETITE
No appetite for anything except sweet pudding or cake.
Aversion to meat.
Ate nothing for three days.
No appetite for breakfast (old symptom absent for years).
Appetite diminished.
Desire for sweets.
Most distress after midday and evening meal.
No hunger, goes till he feels faint.
Can eat plenty but does not enjoy it.
More thirst than usual.
Thirst for cold drinks though nothing tastes good.
Bad taste in forenoon.
Bitter taste.

NAUSEA, VOMITING
Nausea and vomiting with profuse sweat after immense stool at 4 a.m., seven days after taking.
Slightly sick at stomach.
Vomiting ceased, though colic pain remained in lower abdomen for twelve days.

ABDOMEN
Abdomen distended with full feeling. (Pulsatilla which a year ago helped for months a train of symptoms, had only very slight effect).
Flatulence with ineffectual desire for stool.
Heaviness and fullness in lower abdomen after eating small quantity.
Uneasy feeling in lower abdomen at intervals like fomentation, as though diarrheea would follow.
Wind around heart, flatus and flatulence as though diarrhcea would commence.
Drawing gnawing in region of appendix, as though inflammation were beginning.
Sensation in right lower abdomen, as though bubbles were forming and wanting to burst (Relieved by Taraxacum for twenty-four hours).
Flatulence with ineffectual desire for stool.
Colicky pains in right lower abdomen, sometimes extending behind the hip, and retained urine.
Moving aggravates the colic pains, especially on right of abdomen, which seemed adhered to walls, feeling as if torn off. Had to keep a large towel pad between abdomen and thigh to support abdomen and prevent the excruciating pain.
Pain in right side just above crest of ilium, with an irritation in larynx causing cough in morning after rising and before eating; eating relieved cough, but the side felt bruised when bending, or jarring, or pressing it.

STOOL
Catarrhal inflammation of rectum, with discharge of mucus slightly bloody after action of bowels, in course of two or three days (a trouble he had once before).
Seven days after taking medicine, roused out of bed at 4 a.m. with desire for stool and complete evacuation of immense quantity, followed by nausea and vomiting, profuse sweat, pain in right lower abdomen, retained urine, vesical tenesmus continuing for twelve hours, till 4 p.m., after which urine became freer, vomiting ceased; colic pains remained for twelve days.
Stools green, though normal in consistency.
On straining to stool a sore sensation in nates.
Ineffectual urging to stool, with flatulence.

URINE
Retained urine, vesical tenesmus after enormous evacuation, vomiting for twelve hours to 4 p.m.
Seven days from beginning of attack return of renal colic with vomiting, continuous nausea and retention of urine on left side. A clutching pain from left kidney to bladder that never relaxed for four hours, causing the wildest demonstration of agony, ghastly face, blue rings around sunken eyes, cold sweat with trembling, frightful restlessness, urine retained in ureter (giving a perfect picture of Tabacum which relieved at once). As soon as the pain in ureter relaxed after it, urine was filling up the bladder and then passed without pain. Some spasm remained and was relieved by Cantharis in five minutes. (She had something of a like trouble a year ago, but not so severe as this, only a strangury).
Did not want to answer questions, did not want to see anybody or talk to anybody, complete misanthropy.
Great prostration followed this attack.
Frequent urination, worse after getting into bed.
Pressure as from congestion about kidneys.

SEXUAL ORGANS
Sexual desire lost in man.
Testes relaxed, impotent feeling.
Unnatural or disgusting, lewd dreams on several nights, or several times in one night.
Pain darting upward in region of left ovary when sitting, walking or standing.
Menses dark green one day.
Second day of menses a violent sick headache, pulsating pressure outward in forehead as if: bursting, vomiting, (pain relieved by hot water application).
After cessation of menstruation for six months it reappeared again, violent, profuse, without pain but prostrating, the flow lasting several days.
Three or four days before menstruation, felt from waist down as if bursting with distention and weight in abdomen, and wanted to hold herself up, relieved by the flow. Mental condition upset, she would like to kill somebody, (three years ago she proved Uranium nitrate. Up to that time had never missed a regular menstruation, but irregular ever since).

AIR PASSAGES
Cough caused by palpitation during evening.
In morning and after rising and before eating, a cough caused by irritation in larynx, accompanied by a pain in right side just above the crest of ilsum, eating relieved cough, but side felt bruised when bending, jarring or pressing it.
In less than a week a cough with tearing sensation in bronchi, hoarseness, palpitation.
Phlegm of greenish hue causing cough in crawling up.
On rising in morning expectoration of considerable white mucus.
Much expectoration of tough mucus as large as fingers' ends, whitish like gelatine, raised easily.
Raising of jelly-like mucus, worse in forenoon, tenacious and tough.
Grayish expectoration.

CHEST
Wandering sticking pains in chest, worse on right side.
Stitching pain in right upper chest going through to upper part of scapula.
Sense of contraction across middle chest.
Contraction of chest at night relieved by belching.
Left chest bulged out like enlargement of heart (old symptom of inflammatory rheumatism twenty-five years ago).
Sensation of drops of water trickling down on inside of chest.
Sensation in left side as if fingers pressed costal cartilages in, followed by sensation as if something broke inside, with temporary relief.

HEART
Palpitation during evening causing cough.
Pulsations greatly diffused and violent, provoking an exclamation which was suppressed, accompanied with a desire to walk in open air, and entirely relieved by lying.
Sharp pain at apex of heart, better by lying on left side.
Palpitation of heart.
Palpitation with a cough with tearing sensation in bronchi and hoarseness.
Painful bulging of left chest over cardiac region (old symptom of inflammatory rheumatism twenty-five years ago) .
Heart's sounds keep him awake while lying on left side.
Dull and constant soreness around heart, and worse in legs and arms.
Wind around heart, flatus and flatulence as though diarrhoea would begin.

BACK
Awakened earlier than usual by dull aching in left occiput, and immediately in left sacro-iliac region, then posterior thigh and calf for fifteen minutes.
Pain in dorsal region.
Lame and stiff in back.
Aching whole length of spine.
After waking at daybreak next morning, sensation in dorsal region of spine as if its convexity were interior and drawn far forward, lasting but a minute, and followed by a very uncomfortable feeling in that region, lasting a much longer time.
Sore feeling across loins as after a heavy cold.
Sensation as if a cool drop of sweat going down left side of spine.
Soreness in small of back.
A paralytic sensation extending from spine down left leg.
Rheumatic-like fever in trunk, steady dull pain going steadily from trunk to legs, and finally to heels, worse in left knee, worse stepping on heel, on underside of heel, (old symptom of inflammatory rheumatism twenty-five years ago.)
Pressure in small of back as from congestion about kidneys.

UPPER EXTREMITIES
Magnetic thrill in right hand, extending up forearm.
Tingling in both arms as of electric current, or as if asleep.
Intermittent, slightly burning, rheumatic-like pain in right carpo-metacarpal articulation, extending from index finger up outside of right forearm.
Rheumatic pain in left wrist and forearm.
Rheumatic twinge in last two phalangeal articulations of index and middle fingers for a short time in forenoon.
Aching extensor muscles of right forearm going up to shoulder.
Rheumatic pain in right wrist and arm.
Tingling like pins and needles in left hand.
Tingling in right hand.
Can't hold things in left hand, powerless or clumsy.
Palms of hands, which were rough and scaly and bleeding at times, became smooth and natural during the proving. Healing action. (Afterward they went back to former state when general health improved).

LOWER EXTREMITIES
Lower part of both legs asleep, tingling, as if from electric battery more in right, immediately.
Sciatic pain in right hip.
Rheumatic pains in limbs.
Dull aching posterior aspect of thigh and calf in morning, from above downward.
Pain in right sciatic nerve on walking.
Rheumatic pains in front of right thigh.
Drawing aching discomfort in right thigh through hip and knee down through toes, immediately.
Feeling as if somebody were drawing icy hands over thigh downward, aggravatingly slow. (This occurred first twelve years ago after a nervous shock and did not return for five years).
Varicose veins inside of knees and legs, with swelling and soreness, (returned after years).
Had always heat and swelling of feet in spring, which is better now although it is spring. Healing action.
On inside of left knee sensation in different spots painful as if hairs were being pulled, worse walking, better rubbing or scratching.
Rheumatic-like fever in trunk, steady dull pain going steadily down to legs and finally to heels, worse in left knee, worse stepping on heel, on underside of heel (old symptom of inflammatory rheumatism twenty-five years ago).

FEVER
Chills as soon as beginning to sleep, running up back, preventing sleep.
Chilly whilst undressing in warm room.
Chilliness on moving or from draft.
Chill going down back, followed by paralytic feeling in right cheek.
Wave-like sensation as if it would break out in perspiration.
Profuse perspiration on getting into bed, keeping him awake.
Spells of feverishness, perspiration and weakness.

SLEEP
Kept awake by heart's sound while lying on left side.
Sleepy with headache.
Only snatches of sleep during these twelve days, always followed by mental depression, during suffering from nephralgia.
As soon as she begins to sleep, chills rumling up back preventing sleep.
Sleepy, but unable to sleep for some hours after retiring.
Sleeplessness constant and troublesome (relieved permanently by a bottle of Pabst Malt Extract).
Drowsy all night while sitting up.
Drowsiness leaves the instant when lying down, so cannot sleep.
Goes to sleep on right side, but wakes on left side.
Symptoms worse when getting into bed, worse after sunset.
Profuse perspiration on getting into bed, keeping him
Sleepy during day.
Waking frequently at night from no apparent cause.
All symptoms worse in bed.
Frequent urination, worse after getting in bed.
(Symptoms better after Bell. or Acon. for a short time; better from ale, which puts him asleep).
Dreams of distressing nature.
Sleep not unrefreshing, though apparently dreaming
Awaking with headache lasting all day.
Recurrence of a dream which used to trouble her many years ago. (This dream was repeated at wide intervals over twenty years ago). Now it came every night for five times.
Dreams of strife, busy dreams.
Very vivid lewd dreams, repeated night after night.
Unnatural lewd and disgusting dreams, occurring on several nights and several times in one night.

SKIN
Reappearance of an old, slight, pimply eruption on left side of forehead.
Return of a slight eruption on outside of lower legs, burning when scratched, worse after scratching.

GENERAL SYMPTOMS
General tired and sick feeling.
Persistent exhaustion and languor, not attributable to Spring.
Lame and sore all over.
Trembling all over.
Body tired and exhausted.
Nervous powerlessness in limbs.
Sensation of swooning at times during day and night, feeling like dying.
Prostrated for a long time.
All symptoms worse in bed.
All symptoms worse toward evening and at night.
Mental and physical aggravation markedly pronounced toward evening.
Symptoms intermittent in character, the first observed symptoms have all returned at irregular intervals. Muscles feel soft objectively. Generally worse in open air. Twitching internally in various parts. Symptoms gradually increasing in severity after noon.


Sankaran’s ‘Sensations-Kingdoms’ Method- Homeopathy Crippled By Lack Of Basic Scientific Awareness

Corner stone of ‘Sankaran Method’ is classifying drugs into ‘animal’, ‘plant’, and ‘mineral’ kingdoms. Then each kingdom is related with particular group of ‘vital sensations’. Plant remedies are used for individuals having ‘vital sensations’ belonging to the group of ‘sensitivity’, animal remedies are used for those having ‘viatal sensations’ belonging to the class of ‘survival instincts’, and mineral remedies for ‘structural consciousness’.

First, we have to analyze the concept of ‘remedy kingdoms’. Medicinal properties of any remedy is determined by the chemical structure and properties of the individual chemical molecules they contain. Because, it is individual drug molecules that act upon biological molecules, produce inhibitions, molecular pathology and associated symptoms. During potentization, it is the individual drug molecules that undergo molecular imprinting, and as such, it is the individual molecular imprints that act as therapeutic agents. In the absence of this molecular perspective of our medicinal substances, we fall prey to all sorts of unscientific theories that misguide us gravely.

Let us consider a particular remedy belonging to plant kingdom. The molecular composition as well as chemical and medicinal properties of the particular drug sample will be decided by various factors. It will contain kingdom-specific, family-specific, species-specific, variety specific, plant-specific and environmental-specific chemical molecules. Part of plant from which the drug substance is extracted is also a decisive factor. Nux vomica tinctures prepared from seeds, fruits, flowers, leaves, bark or root of nux vomica plant will have different molecular composition and medicinal properties. Some molecules will be common to all samples from a particular plant. Certain other molecules will be common to all samples from a particular species. There will be some molecules common to family, as well as some common to plant kingdom as a whole. Plants belonging to same family will have some common genes, which would produce some similar proteins and enzymes, that would lead to similar molecular processes and synthesis of similar molecules. There would be kingdom-specific, family specific, species specific, variety specific and individual specific and tissue specific chemicals in a plant drug.

As per this perspective, medicinal properties of a given drug substance of ‘plant kingdom’ will be decided by the collective properties of organ specific, plant specific, variety specific, species specific, family specific and kingdom specific chemical molecules contained in them. It is obvious that it is wrong to think that medicinal properties of a drug substance could be assumed by the ‘kingdom’ to which it belongs.

This is applicable to all drugs belonging to mineral as well as animal kingdoms.

When animal or plant substances are disintegrated or divided into individual molecules, they become similar to mineral drugs at molecular level. There are many drugs which could not be included in any particular kingdom. Petroleum is a mineral, but it is the product of disintegration of animal and vegetable matter under ocean beds. Acetic acid is a mineral, but it is prepared from vegetable products. How can we say lactic acid, prepared from milk is plant remedy or mineral remedy? All of us consider calc carb as mineral drug, but exactly it is the ‘middle layer of oyster shells’, and as such, is an animal drug. Kreasote is combination of phenols prepared from wood, and how can we say it is ‘plant’ or ‘mineral’?

At molecular level, the dividing line between ‘plant, animal and mineral’ kingdoms is irrelevant. It is the molecular structure and chemical properties that decide the medicinal properties. To be more specific, it is the functional groups or moieties that act as decisive factor. Classifying drugs on the basis of ‘kingdoms’ and assigning certain ‘mental level sensations’ to them is totally unscientific and illogical. It illustrates the pathetic level of scientific awareness that rules the propagators of ‘sankaran method’.

Rajan Sankaran’s ‘sensation’ method is based on the concepts of ‘deeper level vital sensations’ and corresponding ‘remedy kingdoms’. This method has nothing in common with classical homeopathy, where symptoms belonging to mentals, physical generals and particulars, with their qualifications such as causations, sensations, locations, modalities and concomitants decide the selection of similimum.

According to this theory, ‘structure’ is the basic sensation of ‘minerals’, ‘sensitivity’ is the basic sensation of ‘plants’ and ‘survival’ is the basic sensation of ‘animals’.

According to this methods, case taking involves an inquiry into ‘deeper levels of consciousness’, by prompting the patient to introspect from ‘symptoms’ into ‘deeper, deeper and still deeper’ levels so that his basic ‘vital sensation’ is explored. Then this ‘vital sensation’ is used to decide the ‘kingdom’ to which the patient belong. Remedies are selected from these ‘remedy kingdoms’.

The most dogmatic part of this theory is the relating of ‘vital sensation’ with ‘remedy kingdoms’. On what basis sankaran says ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation’ of ‘plants’? Any logical or scientific explanation for this relationship? If we go through materia medica of various drugs, we can see many ‘animal’ and ‘minerals drugs’ having sensitivity of high order. How can anybody claiming to be a homeopath ignore the whole drug provings and materia medica to declare that ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation’ of ‘plants’ only?

When a homeopath says ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation of plants, it means all plant remedies have produced such a characteristic sensation in healthy individuals during drug proving. To say ‘animal drugs’ have ‘vital sensation’ of ‘survival instinct’, a homeopath should be capable of showing examples from materia medica to justify that statement. Same with ‘vital sensations’ of mineral drugs. Our materia medica does not show that only ‘plant drugs’ produced ‘sensitivity’ in provers. We can see many ‘animal’ and ‘mineral’ drugs with high order of ‘sensitivity’. If not from materia medica, where from Dr Sankaran ‘invented’ that ‘vital sensation’ of ‘sensitivity’ is the basic characteristic of ‘plant kingdom’?

See the rubric ‘sensitive’ in ‘mind’ of kent repertory:

[Kent]Mind : SENSITIVE, oversensitive:- Acon., Aesc., Aeth., Alum., Am-c., Anac., Ang., Ant-c., Apis., Arg-n., Arn., Ars., Ars-i., Asaf., Asar., Aur., Bar-c., Bell., Bor., Bov., Bry., Calc., Calc-p., Calc-s., Camph., Cann-s., Canth., Carb-an., Carb-s., Carb-v., Cast., Caust., Cham., Chin., Chin-a., Chin-s., Cic., Cina., Clem., Cocc., Coff., Colch., Coloc., Con., Crot-h., Cupr., Daph., Dig., Dros., Ferr., Ferr-ar., Ferr-p., Fl-ac., Gels., Gran., Hep., Hyos., Ign., Iod., Kali-ar., Kali-c., Kali-i., Kali-n., Kali-p., Kali-s., Kreos., Lac-c., Lach., Laur., Lyc., Lyss., Mag-m., Med., Meph., Merc., Mez., Mosch., Nat-a., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nat-p., Nat-s., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Ph-ac., Phos., Plat., Plb., Psor., Puls., Ran-b., Sabad., Sabin., Samb., Sanic., Sars., Seneg., Sep., Sil., Spig., Stann., Staph., Sulph., Tab., Teucr., Ther., Thuj., Valer., Verat., Viol-t., Zinc.

In this list, 46 remedies belong to ‘mineral kingdom’: alumina, ammo carb, antim crud, arg nit, ars, ars iod, aur, baryta, borax, calc, calc phos, calc sulph, carb sulph, causticum, cupr, ferr, ferr ars, ferr ph, fl acid, hep, iod, kali group, mag mur, mercury, natrum group, nit acid, phos acid, phos, platinum, plumbum, sanicula, silicea, stannum, suplh, zinc.

12 remedies are from ‘animal kingdom’: Apis, cantharis, carb an, crot h, lac can, lach, med, moschus, psorinum, sep, theri.

Remaining 56 remedies are of ‘plant kingdom’.

On what basis sankaran says ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation’ of plant kingdom? How can anybody say persons who are ‘sensitive’ at the deeper’ level need ‘plant remedies only? How can this theory be called homeopathy?

Similarly, if we examine various rubrics belonging to ‘survival’ instinct, or ‘structural’ sensations, we can see they are not limited to animal or mineral remedies only. Many ‘plant remedies’ have such symptoms.

According to Rajan Sankaran, FEAR is the indication of VITAL SENSATION of ‘survival instincts’ which need an ANIMAL KINGDOM drug. Based on which materia medica rajan sankaran says ‘vital sensation’ of ‘fear’ indicates only ‘animal kingdom remedy’?

Please see the MIND rubric FEAR in Kent Repertory:

[Kent]Mind : FEAR:- Absin., Acet-ac., Acon., Aeth., Agar., Agn., Aloe., Alum., Am-c., Anac., Ang., Ant-c., Ant-t., Arg-n., Ars., Ars-i., Asaf., Aur., Bapt., Bar-c., Bar-m., Bell., Bor., Bry., Bufo., Cact., Calad., Calc., Calc-p., Calc-s., Camph., Cann-i., Cann-s., Caps., Carb-an., Carb-s., Carb-v., Cast., Caust., Cham., Chin., Chin-a., Chlor., Cic., Cimic., Coca., Coc-c., Cocc., Coff., Coloc., Con., Croc., Crot-h., Cupr., Daph., Dig., Dros., Dulc., Echi., Elaps., Eupho., Ferr., Ferr-ar., Ferr-p., Form., Gels., Gent-c., Glon., Graph., Hell., Hep., Hydr-ac., Hyos., Hyper., Ign., Iod., Ip., Kali-ar., Kali-br., Kali-c., Kali-i., Kali-n., Kali-p., Kali-s., Lach., Lil-t., Lob., Lyc., Lyss., Mag-c., Mag-m., Manc., Meli., Merc., Merc-i-r., Mez., Mosch., Mur-ac., Murx., Nat-a., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nat-p., Nat-s., Nicc., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Onos., Op., Petr., Phos., Phyt., Pip-m., Plat., Psor., Puls., Ran-b., Raph., Rheum., Rhod., Rhus-t., Rhus-v., Ruta., Sec., Sep., Sil., Spig., Spong., Squil., Stann., Staph., Stram., Stront., Stry., Sul-ac., Sulph., Tab., Tarent., Thuj., Til., Valer., Verat., Zinc.

See. 75 drugs belong to PLANT KINGDOM! 54 are MINERAL drugs! Only 9 ANIMAL drugs! How Rajan Sankaran say only ANIMAL drugs are indicated for ‘vital sensation’ of ‘survival instincts’? By this approach, the practitioner who looks only ‘animal’ drugs is actually deprived of a large number of drugs belonging to other ‘kingdoms’, one of which may be the real similimum.

There may be many patients ‘sensitive at deeper levels’ who may require ‘animal’ or ‘mineral’ drugs if we select drugs using homeopathic method of totality of symptoms. Limiting all ‘sensitive’ patients to ‘plant kingdom’ remedies may be detrimental in such cases.

Rajan Sankaran says FEAR is the expression if ‘vital sensation of survival instincts’ which the ‘theme’ or quality of ‘animals’. As such, sankaran method uses only ‘animal remedies’ for people exhibiting ‘deep seated’ fear.

Homeopathic understanding of medicinal properties of drug substances are based on symptoms produced in healthy individuals during drug provings. Those symptoms are listed in our materia medica and repertories. We similimum by comparing symptoms of patients with symptoms of drugs, which is the basis of our therapeutic principle ‘similia similibus curentur’.

Please go to KENT REPERTORY - MIND - FEAR: Aconite, Argentum Nit, Aurum, Bell, Borax, Calc Phos, Calc, Carb sulph, Cicuta, Digitalis, Graphites, Ignatia, Kali Ars, Lyco, Lyssin, Nat Carb, Phos, Platina, Psor, Sepia and Stram are the drugs listed with THREE MARKS under FEAR.

As per homeopathic method of similimum being selected on the basis of our materia medica, these are the prominent drugs to be considered in patients with characeristic sensation of FEAR.

But, according to Sankaran, FEAR indicates ‘vital sensation’ of ‘survival instincts’, which needs ‘animal remedies’ only. Only animal remeies found in above list are Lyssin, Psorinum and Sepia. Homeopaths practicing sankaran method will obviously ignore all other drugs in this list, since they are not ‘animal remedies’. Does this approach strengthen homeopaths, or debilitate them?

I want to know, from where sankaran got the idea that only ‘plant remedies’ have ‘fear’ and ‘survival instincts’? Which drug proving? Which materia medica? A person cannot claim to be homeopath by ignoring all available homeopathic literature on materia medica, and producing materia medica and symptoms from his fancies.

Some people claim, Sankaran’s concepts are based on his ‘observations’. Did he conducted drug provings of all drugs and ‘observe’ their symptoms? Did he prove the symptoms given in our materia medica are not reliable? Which proving showed him sepia, lyssin and psorinum has more ‘fear’ than phos, bell, stram or arg nit?

Would Sankaran say a homeopath cannot cure a patient having ‘survival insticts’ and ‘fear’ using phosporous or stramonium, if they turn out to be similimum on the basis of totality of symptoms. Should we avoid phos, since it is not an ‘animal drug’?

Please see following rubrics:

[Kent]Mind : FIGHT, wants to:- Bell., Bov., Hipp., Hyos., Merc., Sec.

[Kent]Mind : QUARRELSOME:- Acon., Agar., Alum., Ambr., Am-c., Anac., Anan., Ant-t., Arn., Ars., Aster., Aur., Bar-c., Bell., Bor., Bov., Brom., Bry., Calc., Calc-s., Camph., Canth., Caps., Caust., Cench., Cham., Chel., Chin., Con., Cor-r., Croc., Crot-h., Cupr., Dig., Dulc., Elaps., Ferr., Ferr-ar., Fl-ac., Hipp., Hyos., Ign., Ip., Kali-ar., Kali-c., Kali-i., Lach., Lepi., Lyc., Lyss., Merc., Merl., Mez., Mosch., Nat-a., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nat-s., Nicc., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Olnd., Pall., Petr., Ph-ac., Phos., Plat., Plb., Psor., Ran-b., Rat., Rheum., Ruta., Seneg., Sep., Spong., Stann., Staph., Stram., Stront., Sul-ac., Sulph., Tarent., Thea., Thuj., Til., Verat., Verat-v., Viol-t., Zinc.

According to Sankaran, ‘quarelling’ and ‘fighting’ indicates ‘survival instincts’, which require ‘animal remedies’.

Under the rubric “Mind : FIGHT, wants to”, not a single ‘animal remedy’ is seen, except hipp.

Under ‘quarrelsome’, ambra, asterias,cantharis, cenchris, corralium, crotalus, elaps, hipp, lach, lyssin, psor, sep, spong, and tarent are the animal remedies.

Would you say, all remedies other than these ‘animal remedies’ should be eliminated while selecting a similimum for this patient?

According to Sankaran, JEALOUSY is a ‘vital sensation’ of ‘ANIMAL KINGDOM’.

See this rubric:

[Kent]Mind : JEALOUSY:- Anan., Apis., Calc-p., Calc-s., Camph., Cench., Coff., Gall-ac., Hyos., Ign., Lach., Nux-v., Op., Ph-ac., Puls., Raph., Staph., Stram.

LACHESIS and HYOS are 3 marks drugs for this symptom. Only APIS, CENCHRIS, and LACHESIS are ‘animal’ drugs’. Anan, Camph, Coff, Hyos, Ign, Nux, Opium, Puls, Raph, Staph and Stram are ‘plant remedies’. Calc P, Calc S, Gall ac and Phos ac are mineral drugs.

We will have to eliminate HYOS when searching a similimum for a person with jealousy as a prominent symptom, if we follow Sankaran method!

Homeopathic materia medica or repertory does not support Sankaran’s theory that persons with ‘vital sensation’ of ‘jealousy’ would require ‘animal drugs’ only.

Sankaran says LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE indicates a vital sensation of ‘structural consciousness’, which is a MINERAL quality. Only ‘mineral drugs’ have to be considered for patients exhibiting ‘vital sensation of LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE.

See this rubric in kent repertory:

[Kent]Mind : CONFIDENCE, want of self:- Agn., Alum., Anac., Anan., Ang., Arg-n., Aur., Bar-c., Bell., Bry., Calc., Canth., Carb-an., Carb-v., Caust., Chin., Chlor., Dros., Gels., Hyos., Ign., Iod., Kali-c., Kali-n., Kali-s., Lac-c., Lach., Lyc., Merc., Mur-ac., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Olnd., Op., Pall., Phos., Plb., Puls., Ran-b., Rhus-t., Ruta., Sil., Stram., Sul-ac., Sulph., Tab., Ther., Verb., Viol-t., Zinc.

Only ANACARDIUM is 3 marks drug for this symptom. It is a PLANT REMEDY!

24 drugs- Agnus, Anac, Anan, Ang, Bell, Bry, Carb v, China, Dros, Gels, Hyos, Ign, Lyc, Nux V, Oleand, Opium, Puls, Ran b, Rhus t, Ruta, Stram, Tab, Verb and Viol t are PLANT REMEDIES.

5 drugs- Canth, Carb an, Lac can, Lach and Ther are ANIMAL DRUGS.

23 drugs- Alum, Arg Nit, Aur, Bar c, Calc, Caust, Chlor, Iod, Kali c, Kali n, Kali s, Merc, Mur ac, Nat c, Nat m, Nit ac, Pall, Phos, Plumb, Sil, Sul ac, Sul and Zinc are MINERAL DRUGS.

Materia medica or repertories no way justify Sankaran’s theory that LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE would require only MINERAL REMEDIES. How can a person claiming to be homeopath make a theory and method of practice totally ignoring our whole materia medica and drug proving?

Sankaran’s reputation, experience or vast followings should not prevent us from asking genuine questions. We need answers for these questions, since Sankaran claims to be a homeopath.

Sankaran’s method will result in gravely disabled in incapacitated homeopathic practice, preventing homeopaths from utilizing the unlimited potentials of our materia medica.

Obviously, the basic dogma of ‘sensations-kingdom’ relationship on which ‘Sankaran method’ is built up, lacks the support of logic or materia medica.

Anybody can make any theories. But it is wrong to say it is homeopathy.

Rajan Sankaran gives a case of ‘tumor in eye ball’ cured by ‘argentum nit’ as an example of successful employment of his ‘sensation method’:

“I had a case of a man with a tumor in his eyeball, and he described it thus; that this tumour caused a certain “imbalance” in his eyes. Then he described this imbalance as a sense of inco-ordination, and further, how co-ordination was the most important thing in his life; how everything needed to be co-ordinated. Going further along this line, he said it’s the kind of co-ordination that a pilot needs when piloting his plane, or a rocket scientist needs when he makes a rocket. It’s the kind of co-ordination that an actor needs when he is performing live on stage, and several such examples.”

“At some point, he described a situation where his mother-in-law did something behind his back, and when I asked him what he had felt about it, he replied that he felt very disappointed, and betrayed. Now, these emotions of disappointment and betrayal are present in his case, and one might be tempted to use rubrics like “ailments from disappointment, or betrayal”. But if you ask further, “Describe the disappointment”, then you bring out the true individuality of the person in the circumstance. When somebody does something behind your back, which is not expected, the feeling of disappointment is common, not individual. Hahnemann always emphasized the individualizing phenomena, the characteristic symptoms.”

“Here, when we look at disappointment, it’s not individual enough, not characteristic enough. Go further. When I asked him, “Describe the disappointment”, he said, “It’s as if somebody had punched me in my stomach.” This now gets more characteristic. Take it one step further. I asked him, “Describe the experience of being punched” and he said, “I feel completely suffocated.” “Describe suffocation.” And it opens out and you find that there is the suffocation sensation in many areas in his life, like when swimming, or in claustrophobic situations, etc. That suffocation sensation, along with the sense of importance of co-ordination and control, like a stage artist, or a plane pilot, gives us the remedy Argentum nitricum, which has the control, co-ordination as well as the suffocation. That remedy cured the tumour in his eye.”

“So the “ailments from disappointment” or “delusion that somebody had punched his stomach”, is a more superficial expression. The deeper expression is the tremendous sense of suffocation that he felt, not only in the situation with his mother-in-law, but in every area of his life. A sensation that is so individual, and so completely unconnected with the external reality that it becomes the most individualizing symptom of the person, both physical and mental. It is at the Sensation level.”

MY COMMENTS ON THIS CASE:
When we analyze, this case, we would realize that sankaran did not utilize his ‘kingdom approach’ in this case. He does not say ‘argentum nitricum’ was selected as a ‘mineral drug’, as he normally does. Instead, he says “suffocation sensation, along with the sense of importance of co-ordination and control, like a stage artist, or a plane pilot, gives us the remedy Argentum nitricum, which has the control, co-ordination as well as the suffocation. That remedy cured the tumour in his eye.

Rajan Sankaran, being a very experienced physician having mastered the materia medica and successfully treated thousands of cases in his practice, could rightly select ‘arg nit’ as the correct similimum from symptoms such as ‘general sensation of suffocation’, ‘sensation of incordination’, and of course, from other numerous symptoms and observations he would have collected during case taking but opted to give in his case report.

Can any less experienced follower of Sankaran, with lesser materia medica knowledge, ever select ‘arg nit’ as the similimum of this patient, on the basis of ‘suffocation’ and ‘incoordination’ only, and a knowledge that patient needs a ‘mineral drug’ as per Sankaran’s theory? Please note, Sankaran does not mention ‘kingdom’ while explaining this case.

Any homeopath who knows how to take case, repertorize and decide a similimum using materia medica, could have very easily selected ‘arg nit’ in this case by classical method in a very simple way.

Since the patient is coming with ‘tumor in eye’, an ordinary homeopath would start case taking by collecting symptoms with ‘eye’ and ‘vision’, trying to collect all modalities, sensations and concomitants associated with ‘eye’ and ‘vision’.

The ‘incoordination’ in eyes sankaran talks about will have to be probed in detail, to know whether it is problems of accommodation(accommodation defective), dimness of vision, diplopia, moving vision, alternate vanishing of vision or anything like that. Remember, all these problems of vision could be seen in materia medica of ‘arg nit’ in high order. Observe whether there is any chemosis, echymosis, lachrymation, pain, swelling, or any other peculiar sensations in eyes, with their modalities. Sensation of fullness in eyes, strbismus, cold-heat modalities also have to be ascertained. Itching, discoloration, frequent wiping, and many such features could be observed.

After completing ‘particulars’, physician would inquire mentals and physical generals. What sankaran interprets as ‘suffocation’ would be described by the patient as aggravation in closed room, desire for open air, aggravation in crowded rooms, general physical anxiety, sensation of balls internally, intolerance of clothing, sensation of being constricted by a band around body, and such symptoms. See, most of these symptoms strongly indicate argentum nitricum.

Regarding his mentals, from what sankaran explained, we can understand there would be symptoms such as persistent anxiety, despair, feeling of betrayed, sadness, anticipations, confusion of mind, being repudiated by relatives, dwelling on past bad experiences, delusions of getting punched, forsaken feelings, mortification and many such symptoms, most of which obviously points to argentum nitricum.

For an experienced homeopath like sankaran, arg nit is the obvious prescription for this case without any special methods and techniques or even repertorization. Any homeopath who could collect these symptoms would reach argentum nit through simple repertorization. As for me, I would have reached arg nit by the time I complete my case taking.

Why should Rajan Sankaran pretend to be finding similimum in this type of obvious cases through his ‘sensation-kingdom’ method, only to confuse youg homeopaths?

That is the game plan of all modern gurus and masters. They would prescribe correctly using their materia medica knowledge and, make results. Then they would pretend the made this miraculous results using their ‘special methods’ they are marketing! Innocent follower is betrayed, and his carrier doomed to be spoiled, by keeing on trying the ‘methods’ the guru taught them.

As part of my mission to evolve and promote scientific homeopathy, I will have to discuss and analyse various existing theories about homeopathy. I will have to point out things I think are not agreeing with modern scientific knowledge system. Such criticisms and discussions are part of work I am engaged in. It is nothing personal. I have no any personal agenda here. I analyse and expose each and every ideas, concepts and methods in homeopathy that hinder scientific transformation of homeopathy.

Earlier, once I took up discussing Dr Vijaykar’s theories, ‘cubs’ and ‘lions’ of that group threatened me for my life. They told me ‘you will have no place to run’. Next came the attacks from marketers of ‘hair transmissionis’. Promoters of ‘energy medicine’ theories also did the same. Homeopathic World Community removed all my articles from their pages, since they could not tolerate my exposures of ‘international masters’ who promote homeopathy as ‘energy medicine’ and practice homeopathy as part of their CAM ‘healing arts’. I had to relinquish my HWC membership on that issue.

Now, it is the turn of disciples of Rajan Sankaran and Jan Scholten. Once I just took up discussing ‘sensation method’, ‘kingdom method’ and ‘periodical table method’, a whole hornet’s nest is infuriated and out for me. I wanted to discuss their theories due to my conviction that scientific homeopathy cannot advance without exposing these highly influential but unscientific theories. My message box is daily full of messages warning me of ‘dire consequences’. Instead of discussing or explaining the points I raised, I am abused, threatened and asked to ‘stay away from our master’. I am accused of being jealous, arrogant, insane and working with hidden personal agendas. They diagnosed my problem as ‘severe skepticemia’!

I just don’t care. I will go on with my mission of evolving homeopathy into a full-fledged medical science. I know I will have to pay a price, perhaps with my life itself. But I am not bothered. Let the dogs bark, caravan will move on!

Without criticizing and exposing wrong ideas and wrong practices, we cannot evolve and promote right ideas and right practices in homeopathy.

I am asked to ‘read all books of sankaran, and apply it myself’ to confirm, before commenting on his theories. I agree that we have to study before commenting or criticizing anything. But, we need not ‘apply’ everything ourselves to ‘confirm’. If that were so, nobody will have the right to comment on homeopathy without practicing it. We cannot criticize allopathy without practicing it ourselves! To criticize astrology, I will have to practice astrology. To say robbery is wrong, I will have do robbery myself! To criticize corruption, I have to be corrupt? To comment on a theory, we have to ‘study’ it well, that is all.

I have commented on Sankaran’s theories after studying it well. I need not practice it for that.

When anybody say only ‘animal drugs’ have to be used in people characterized by ‘vital level sensation of survival instincts’, I can comment on it on the basis of my knowledge of materia medica and drug proving. I need not ‘apply’ that method. I know many homeopathic drugs belonging to plant or mineral kingdoms having that charecteristics. I have applied those drugs in my homeopathic practice very successfully. Any homeopath, who has studied and applied materia medica knows that Sankaran is wrong on this point.

Some friends have expressed their apprehension that criticizing wrong theories and practices happening in homeopathy in public will harm the good will and reputation of our community and our therapeutic system.

I do not subscribe to that view. All these ‘wrong things’ in homeopathy are done and promoted by their propagators in public, without any concern about the harm they are doing, through articles, books, interviews and seminars all over the world, making homeopathy a topic of unending mockery before the scientific community. All these things are already known to general public better than homeopaths themselves.

These people have already done enough damage to homeopathy through their unscientific theories and nonsense practices. They supply arms and ammunition to skeptics to attack homeopathy. There is no meaning in covering up this dirt. Public dirt should be washed in public, to get the lost reputation and credibility of homeopathy back.

If homeopathic community continue let these people go like this, we cannot even dream about making homeopathy a scientific medical system, and get it recognized as such even in a far distant future.

In his Homeopathic Links interview, Vithoulkas says: “Sankaran alone has done more harm to homeopathy than all the enemies of homeopathy together.”

André Saine writes on his website: “Sankaran demonstrated several basic errors of methodology and reasoning in his example of how he ‘discovers’ a remedy”.

How would the followers of Sankaran respond to these statements?

Collect all mentals, physical generals and particular symptoms of your patient, with all qualifications such as causations, sensations, locations, modalities and concomitants. Then grade the symptoms into uncommon, common, mental, physical general and particulars. Then repertorize. Compare the materia medica of drugs coming top in repertorization, and decide a similimum. That is the simple way of homeopathic practice- and the most successful way.

If a drug is similimum according to totality of symptoms, it does not matter whether that drug belongs to animal, mineral or plant kingdoms. It does not matter to which ‘sub kingdom’ or ‘family’ the drug belongs. Such a knowledge does not make any difference in your similimum.

Selecting similimum is most important in homeopathy. Similarity of symptoms is our guide in selecting similimum. All these talk about ‘kingdoms’, sub kingdoms, families and such things only contribute in making homeopathy complex, and confuse the young homeopaths. It may help in creating an aura around the teacher, which would attract people to seminars. That is not a silly thing, where money matters above homeopathy!




Author: Chandran Nambiar M.D.
Source: Dialectical Homeopathy

Los Experimentos Patogenéticos Homeopáticos Producen Síntomas Específicos Diferentes al Placebo

El siguiente artículo es uno de los 15 artículos etiquetados dentro de los EPHs y me parece importante analizarlo. Se titula “Los Experimentos Patogenéticos Homeopáticos (EPHs) Producen Síntomas Específicos Diferentes al Placebo” [17] publicado en la revista Forsch Komplementmed, en el 2009, número 16, páginas 105 a 110 y dirigido por Heribert Möllinger quien se desarrolla en su práctica privada en Amriswil, Suiza, Rainer Schneider del Departamento de Ciencias Humanas de la Universidad de Osnabrück en Alemania, Harald Walach de la Escuela de Ciencias Sociales y el Instituto Samueli, Oficina Europea de la Universidad de Northampton en Inglaterra.

Resumen:
Introducción: Aquí se menciona que la Homoeopatía usa información de voluntarios sanos tomando sustancias homeopáticas (Experimentos Patogenéticos) para tratamiento clínico. El artículo refiere que ha sido controversial si en tales experimentos se producen síntomas diferentes a los que produce un placebo.

Objetivo: Probar si las preparaciones homeopáticas producen síntomas diferentes a los del placebo en voluntarios sanos.                                        

Métodos: Tres estudios protegidos, doble ciego, estudio patogenético experimental aleatorio controlado con placebo en 25 voluntarios sanos, 6 hombres y 19 mujeres,  que tomaron cada uno de dos remedios homeopáticos, Arsenicum Album (8 voluntarios lo tomaron) y Natrum muriaticum (10 voluntarios lo tomaron) a la 30 CH o placebo idéntico (7 voluntarios lo tomaron) en un periodo de 4 días. El parámetro del resultado principal fue el número de síntomas remedio-específicos por grupo. Las sustancias fueron preparadas en fresco por la farmacia homeopática Dolisos en Lausanne Suiza, de acuerdo a la farmacopea homeopática Europea. El código de aleatorización fue creado por un investigador independiente.

Resultados: En promedio, 6 síntomas típicos para Arsenicum Album fueron experimentados por pacientes tomando Arsenicum Album, 5 síntomas para Natrum muriaticum para aquellos tomando Natrum muriaticum y 11 síntomas no específicos para aquellos en el grupo placebo. Las diferencias fueron significativas en conjunto (*Prueba de Kruskall Wallis, p=0.0002,) y significativamente diferente al del placebo (*Prueba de Mann-Whitney, 0.001).

Conclusión: Los remedios Homeopáticos producen síntomas diferentes al placebo.
                        
*Prueba de Kruskall Wallis: En estadística, es un método no paramétrico para probar si un grupo de datos proviene de la misma población.
*Prueba de Mann-Whitney: En estadística, es una prueba no paramétrica aplicada a dos muestras independientes.

Mi observación (del traductor): Llama la atención que el experto utilizado para corroborar si los síntomas del estudio eran de uno u otro remedio haya sido el “synthesis”. Posiblemente si se hubieran utilizado las bases de datos adecuadas como MMP, EC y/o el Therapeutic Pocket Book se habría producido variabilidad en la cantidad de síntomas placebo y/o los síntomas experimentales para ambos remedios. El experimento (como los otros 14 estudios EPHs disponibles) no tenia métodos para depurar los voluntarios en cuanto a la susceptibilidad (Sensibilidad).

Autor:  Dr. Heribert Möllinger,  Rainer Schneider y Harald Walach.
Artículo original: Homeopathic Pathogenetic Trials Produce Specific Symptoms Different fron Placebo.
Publicado en Forschende Komplementärmedizin 2009; 16: 105-110. Enlace al artículo completo en inglés.
Traductor: Dr. José Guillermo Zamora De La Paz, Médico Cirujano UAG, Homeópata por el Institute for Homœopathic Medicine (Dhom. med. Lic).
Fuente: Polony & Weaver Español (Dr. Guillermo Zamora).

Posición acostada de la mujer para parir (Litotomía), una práctica cuestionable

Si tenemos que resumir la historia de la obstetricia en algunos pocos hitos hemos de resaltar por un lado la aparición de los instrumentos que se usan en la atención y por otro destacar el cambio de posición para parir que le fue impuesto a la mujer en los albores de la obstetricia científica.
La utilización de esta práctica es una decisión que define un modelo de atención, que desvía su mirada hacia la consagración de la mujer como “objeto” del trabajo médico. Esta posición es la que define todo el carácter del vínculo asistencial: una mujer acostada en decúbito dorsal con sus muslos y piernas flexionados y sostenidos por encima de ella, atados, y declarando su inmovilidad.

Ya desde el antiguo Egipto nos llegan los testimonios grabados de las mujeres arrodilladas sobre piedras o ladrillos sagrados, o bien acuclilladas, como antecedentes de las sillas paridoras que se usaron por centurias desde el mundo grecorromano hasta avanzados los siglos XVII y XVIII. Aquí se produce la aparición en la escena del parto de un nuevo representante social; el médico, en la habitación y en la intimidad, portando en sus manos los primeros instrumentos y con un naciente discurso científico y deshumanizante, desplazando a la comadrona y al padre.

Al imponer la posición acostada, el médico diseña la facilitación de su tarea. Puede dar órdenes que serán obedecidas. Pierde importancia el mundo afectivo de la mujer. Ya no está ella buscando distintas posiciones según sus necesidades, no puede hacerse sostener por una amiga, por su pareja, alentada y protegida. Acostada, expuesta y vulnerable, ya no será el médico quien se inclina a sus pies para recibir al niño.
Han transcurrido muchos años desde aquellos acontecimientos, que han sido marcados por la evolución del conocimiento y la resolución de numerosas dificultades que atentaron contra la salud de la madre y del niño en el momento del parto y del nacimiento. Pero poco se ha prestado atención al estilo imperante de atención obstétrica y al abuso de prácticas que muchas veces por su uso inadecuado, producen problemas y un claro perjuicio para los requerimientos de satisfacción que un buen número de mujeres reclaman para esta experiencia vital de su existencia. 

La inmensa mayoría de los obstetras insisten hoy en día en la imposición de la litotomía como posición excluyente de la madre para parir, sin ninguna reflexión sobre lo que vive y siente cada mujer, y obligando al niño por nacer, en el recorrido por el canal del parto y su curvatura, que nazca hacia arriba. Como se asevera en numerosos libros de la especialidad y muchos obstetras sostienen en su práctica diaria, la litotomía es la posición más satisfactoria, la mejor, porque la mujer acostada con sus piernas colgadas está en la posición ideal que favorece, para quien la atiende, resolver cualquier complicación, efectuar (por rutina) intervenciones obstétricas (monitoreo fetal continuo) y conservar pautas de esterilidad. 

¿Pero quién considera la situación de la mujer? ¿Se le pregunta si es mejor y más satisfactoria para ella?
La biología no ha previsto que la mujer durante su trabajo de parto permanezca acostada. Puede moverse y cambiar de posición las veces que lo necesite y quiera. Esta movilidad de ninguna manera compromete el bienestar fetal. Esta es la condición de la inmensa mayoría de las mujeres, que usando los códigos médicos, se encuentran en situación de bajo riesgo.
La utilidad de sostener esta posición para la mayoría de las mujeres se expresa por ejemplo en la utilización casi sistemática del control electrónico de los latidos fetales con la presencia de los cinturones ceñidos a su cuerpo y obligándola a estar acostada.
Es decir que la “posición” de la madre es un procedimiento médico, una intervención médica; que responde a criterios precisos de organización, sujetos a la ideología vigente. 

La posición acostada de espaldas es la peor posición que pueda concebirse para el trabajo de parto y el parto. Entre los problemas enumerados desde el punto de vista fisiológico se destacan los siguientes:
a) la compresión de los gruesos vasos sanguíneos dorsales interfiere con la circulación y disminuye la presión sanguínea con la consiguiente disminución de la oxigenación fetal. La actividad contráctil uterina tiende a ser más débil y menos frecuente, y la necesidad de pujar se torna más dificultosa debido al esfuerzo mayor al no estar favorecida por la fuerza de la gravedad. El descenso más lento incrementa el uso del fórceps.
b) El cóccix es comprimido contra la cama de parto, que lo fuerza hacia delante, estrechando la salida pélvica, con la mayor dificultad y alargamiento de la expulsión.
c) La compresión nerviosa, por la presión ejercida sobre las piernas colgadas en los estribos.
d) La ausencia de una efectiva y sostenida presión por parte de la cabeza fetal sobre el periné, no permite una eficaz y pausada distensión del mismo, con la consecuencia de una necesidad compulsiva de realizar una episiotomía que sería innecesaria.
e) El carácter de procedimiento de intervención de la posición de litotomía se completa con anestesias peridurales e infusiones de oxitocina rutinarias que agregan dificultades inherentes a esos procedimientos
f) Estas consideraciones biológicas y fisiológicas, son aún insuficientes para entender la más vasta repercusión sobre la vida afectiva y emocional de cada mujer, que atraviesa la experiencia del parto y el nacimiento de su hijo, y el impacto que tienen estos aspectos íntimamente ligados a su sexualidad. 

El parto es un acontecimiento complejo en el cual intervienen múltiples variables que no pueden interpretarse desde un único discurso médico, sino que debe contemplar y complementarse desde las perspectivas antropológica, psicológica y social.
Es un acontecimiento cargado de emotividad, una escena cargada de simbolismos y de prejuicios, cuando no de ansiedad y angustia, en donde se entrecruzan, la sexualidad, la vida y la muerte; por lo tanto compromete a una diversidad de asistentes profesionales. Estamos frente a un evento biopsicosocial por excelencia.
Pero la medicina aplica un mecanismo de racionalización que reprime aquellos aspectos psicosociales y no biológicos, que no se sujetan al orden médico-social establecido. Así la medicalización del parto tiene en el control de la posición y la posesión corporal del sujeto-persona-mujer uno de sus paradigmas más claros.
No hay un solo estudio que se proponga la posibilidad de interrogar y relevar el grado de satisfacción que esta intervención médica determina en la mujer y que tenga en cuenta las reacciones emocionales de las mismas. 

Este modelo de medicalización (transformación del hecho afectivo y social de parir y hacer nacer en un acto médico conducido y plagado de intervenciones), se sostiene y afirma en otros dos aspectos que caracterizan y ponen valla a la catarata emocional y física que irrumpe continuamente en la mujer durante su parto. Uno de ellos es la despersonalización de la parturienta transformada en un “objeto de trabajo”, un “campo de trabajo”, rendida en su condición de “paciente”, acostada inmóvil y obediente a las prescripciones del “personal”. En esta condición se somete al “torrente animal” de movimientos y sonidos que pulsan internamente por encontrar cauce en su cuerpo “amordazado”. La experiencia de desintegración y pérdida de control resulta intolerable e inmanejable. Un cuerpo-objeto despersonalizado es dócil a la exigencia médica. 

El otro aspecto de enorme relieve es el que compete al atributo por excelencia de esta experiencia, que es el sexual. La des-sexualización en la negación de la carga sexual del parto, asimilándola a una operación médica “esterilizada”. Si afinamos la mirada, tenemos un objeto dentro de un objeto; el “objeto de trabajo” en el cuerpo de la mujer es su aparato genital.
Si reconocemos en el parto un acto sexualizado e íntimo, la participación que tengan otras personas o los profesionales en el mismo, deberá respetar ese momento, tomando en cuenta el lugar distinguido y protagónico que tiene la mujer en el escenario del mismo. 

El conocimiento sexual del propio cuerpo le permite a cada mujer elegir en mejores condiciones, qué posición puede facilitarle el período expulsivo. La posición vertical, patrón de nuestros comportamientos sociales vinculares, permite a cada mujer estar en un plano de igualdad espacial frente a los otros asistentes con los que interactuará simétricamente.


Autor: Dr. Carlos Burgo, médico ginecólogo-obstetra argentino. Parto y Nacimiento Humanizado.

EL HOMEOPÁTICO

A quienes caminen sin prisa por la calle Eloy Gonzalo 3 y 5, cerca de la castiza glorieta de Quevedo, no les puede pasar desapercibido este emblemático recinto conocido desde siempre por los vecinos del barrio de Chamberí como el Hospital Homeopático o, mas sencillamente, el Homeopático, toda una institución en la vida madrileña, afortunadamente restaurada en 2009, después de años de decadencia y postración. 


Con total desconocimiento de lo que ha significado la Homeopatía en la Historia de la Medicina, ausente de prejuicios y ansioso de información, me he apuntado a una visita guiada (información. Teléfono 914466076), de una hora y media de duración, mas o menos, siendo agregado, “solo entre todas las mujeres”, a un grupo de simpáticas señoras, puntuales en la cita e interesadas en las explicaciones
Nos recibe Félix Antón Cortés, patrono y secretario de la Fundación Instituto Homeopático y Hospital de San José, persona culta y amable que lo sabe todo de esta institución. Con base en lo que nos cuenta y en lo que he leído en la página web del Hospital http://www.hospitalhomeopatico.es resumo a continuación la historia de este centro[1].
Historia
El Hospital Homeopático es creación de un grupo de médicos madrileños seguidores del sistema de Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843)[2], el fundador de la Homeopatía. Esta ciencia (pseudo ciencia, según Wikipedia) se basa, según creo entender, en utilizar los efectos terapéuticos de las sustancias tóxicas suministrándolas al enfermo en muy pequeñas dosis para estimular sus defensas, dicho mas técnicamente, “los síntomas de una enfermedad pueden tratarse empleando, a dosis bajas, drogas que en el hombre sano provocan signos parecidos” (ley de la similitud).

La primera noticia de la Homeopatía en España es de 1821 y las primeras aplicaciones de este método terapéutico se realizan en Badajoz en 1830 por Prudencio Querol. El primer periódico homeopático, los "Archivos Homeopáticos", se publica en Cádiz en 1835; el segundo "El Monitor Medico-Qurúrgico" se publica en Madrid en 1837 y el tercero "Archivos de la Medicina Homeopática”, el que alcanza mayor difusión, lo edita, en 1840, Pedro Rino en Badajoz. Estas publicaciones y las que les seguirán como la “Gaceta Homeopática” sirven como medio para crear escuela y aunar contactos entre aquellos primeros médicos del periodo histórico de la Homeopatía española. El más importante de todos ellos, sin minusvalorar a los otros, fue el doctor José Núñez Pernía (1805-1879)[3], el gran propagandista de la Homeopatía, a cuya iniciativa se debió la creación de la Sociedad Hahnemanniana Matritense, autorizada por Real Orden de 23 de abril de 1846.

Volviendo al principio, el grupo de médicos a que antes nos hemos referido, estaba disconforme con la práctica de la medicina convencional que se llevaba a cabo en la época tales como sangrar a los enfermos, aplicarles remedios cruentos, y por lo demás inútiles, para tratar las enfermedades (Una descripción de estas prácticas médicas pude hallarse en el libro de Manuel Usandizaga Soraluce “Historia del Real Colegio de Cirugía de San Carlos de Madrid 1787-1828”). Su actuación, al crear el primer hospital homeopático que hubo en España, en 1872, fue la respuesta que dieron al bloqueo por parte del Gobernador Civil de Madrid a dos Reales Órdenes de 1850 y 1865 que permitían la creación de una clínica y cátedra homeopática universitaria con carácter experimental.
Para erigir el hospital se acudió a una suscripción internacional popular, aunque las dos terceras partes del coste de las obras fueron sufragadas por el Dr. Núñez Pernía, desde 1864, marqués de Núñez. La elección del arquitecto no pudo ser más afortunada pues la dirección de las obras recayó en José Segundo de Lema (1823-1891)[4] que era arquitecto mayor de Palacio. Las obras, sobre una superficie de 3.835 metros cuadrados, dieron comienzo el 26 de mayo de 1872 y terminaron el 2 de febrero de 1878. En 1878 el doctor Nuñez Pernía constituyó la Fundación Instituto Homeopático y Hospital de San José, a la que incorporó, no sin polémica con los colegas de la Sociedad, el hospital recién construido en la que entonces se llamaba calle de la Habana (luego Eloy Gonzalo)

El hospital, al que las gentes conocían como “hospitalillo de la Habana”, tenía capacidad para acoger 50 enfermos (unos 500 anuales) y sostenia un acreditado consultorio homeopático con más de 75.000 consultas anuales, siendo muy popular en Madrid. Su periodo más glorioso se extiende desde finales del siglo XIX hasta la guerra civil nota nueva . En 1892 la Fundación es clasificada por Real Orden como de beneficencia particular. Durante el periodo citado se atienden en el Consultorio Benéfico-Asistencial entre 15.000/25.000 consultas anuales.

En 1926 están documentadas obras de reconstrucción y modernización del Consultorio homeopático (instalación de la calefacción y arreglos).

En 1929 se celebra un Congreso Homeopático Nacional del que dan cuenta periódicos y revistas de la época.

Durante la contienda fratricida, el hospital se convierte en banco de sangre y posteriormente, con la victoria de Franco, en acuartelamiento de una bandera de Falange y de las tropas moras. La mayoría de los médicos homeópatas se exiliaron.
La atención asistencial a los enfermos durante diez años (de 1878 a 1888) estuvo a cargo de las Siervas de María (cuya fundadora era santa Soledad Torres Acosta) y, desde esa última fecha, de las Hijas de la Caridad. El consultorio continuó la asistencia los pacientes hasta 1979.
A partir de 1970 se irá orientando a una labor de residencia que, con una actividad reducida, durará hasta 2007.
En 1977 el Hospital se incluye en el catálogo de edificios y conjuntos de Madrid como “elemento de carácter singular”.
En 1996 se celebra el 150 aniversario de la Sociedad Hahnemanniana Matritense, con una exposición sobe su historia, iniciándose una etapa de recuperación de la documentación (memoria histórica) con la colaboración de las familias de los médicos.
En 1997 el Instituto Homeopático y Hospital de San José fue declarado Bien de Interés Cultural con la categoría de monumento.
En 1999 se pone en marcha el plan director para la reforma del centenario hospital que culmina en 2008. La restauración, financiada por la Comunidad de Madrid con la colaboración de la Fundación Caja Madrid, estuvo a cargo de los arquitectos Ignacio de las Casas y Emilia Checa. La inversión ha sido de unos tres millones de euros.
La mayor parte de las instalaciones está ocupada actualmente por la Universidad de Alcalá, en virtud del convenio de colaboración suscrito entre la Fundación y la citada Universidad. La Fundación realiza exclusivamente actividades de formación médica en Homeopatía, Acupuntura y Medicina y mantiene un consultorio médico especializado en Homeopatía, Acupuntura, Fisioterapia y Medicinas no convencionales. También se celebra allí un Master en Medicinas emergentes, en colaboración con el Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos y otras entidades.
El 10 de enero de 2010 reabre el hospital y está pendiente el plan director para la rehabilitación del segundo edificio de marques de los Salados.
Visita
Las explicaciones, sobrias pero suficientes, de nuestro amable anfitrión tienen lugar en espacio que ocupó la anterior capilla del hospital que conserva su entarimado y vidrieras originales. El retablo neogótico de la cabecera parece que ha sido donado a la Universidad de Alcalá. La única modificación es la adición al muro de un largo friso que corre en rededor de toda la estancia y en que se han pintado los nombres de todas aquellas personas que a lo largo de la historia de la Homeopatía española, anterior aún a la del propio hospital, destacaron por su práctica profesional o por facilitar su ayuda. Entre estos “homeópatas históricos” o benefactores de la institución, anoto los nombres de Vicente Querol, José Núñez Pernía, José Segundo de Lema Hipólito Rodríguez Pinilla, primer catedrático de Hidrología Médica de la Universidad Central, Francisco de Castro y Pascual, primer catedrático de Microbiología, Gastón de Iriarte, Risueño de Amador, Francisco de Beniatúa, Pedro de Arostegui, visitador médico del Hospital y autor de la primera tesis doctoral sobre homeopatía en 1850, Anastasio García López, que pronunció la lección inaugural de las actividades académicas del Instituto en 1878, autor, además de numerosos estudios, de una interesante novela “homeopática”, escrita con pseudónimo “La magia del siglo XIX", Tomás Pellicer Frutos, el mejor discípulo y continuador de la obra de Núñez Pernía, Pedro Rino Hurtado, Manuel Sánchez, Joaquín Núñez Grimaldos, marqués de los Salados, sin que falte la mención a la reina Isabel II y a la infanta Isabel la Chata, presidenta de honor de la Junta Protectora del Instituto. Todos estos nombres ilustres, evidencian que los médicos homeópatas no fueron unos profesionales frustrados de la Medicina, sino unos médicos brillantes que cultivaron una especialidad que, contrariamente a lo que algunos suponen no estuvo nunca prohibida en España, ni siquiera en la época del dictador Franco.

A la derecha de la capilla, donde estuvo en su tiempo la sacristía, se halla instalada la Farmacia Homeopática, que, al decir de los entendidos, es única en su género, con curiosos preparados y un sin fin de pequeños botecitos destinados a la práctica de la homeopatía.
Salimos a una de las galerías de madera bañadas por el sol de la mañana que penetra a través de las cristaleras (los homeópatas consideraban que la luz era una fuerza maravillosa de salud y curación). En su tiempo estas galerías debían estar al servicio de los pacientes convalecientes. En el piso bajo hemos visitado antes, era el punto de reunión, una sala situada en un extremo, donde estuvo ubicada una de las enfermerías. Cada una de ellas tenía doce ventanales entre los cuales se situaban las camas de los enfermos. Por bajo corría un zócalo de azulejos blancos y azules, que todavía se conservan en parte en los espacios adyacentes.

Salimos al jardín. Mientras las simpáticas señoras del grupo se hacen unas fotografías, aprovecho para curiosear. Ante mi tengo un edificio en forma de U cuyos cimientos, estructuras y cubiertas han sido completamente saneados, luciendo una amplia gama de colores que realzan su sencilla funcionalidad: “verdes los fraileros y ventanas, marrones los canecillos, guinda las tapas de las cornisas y rosa los muros”[5].


Delante, sobre alto pedestal, la estatua de San José y el Niño a la que recuerdo pintada de blanco y que ahora presenta su color original. Detrás de ella se encuentra, bajo una lápida, el enterramiento del fundador, el doctor Nuñez Pernía cuyo cuerpo parce que fue embalsamado. Curioso personaje este de quien he leído semblanzas biográficas en extremo laudatorias a su persona, pero que sospecho debió tener también sus sombras, como reflejan sus discrepancias con otros miembros de la Sociedad Hahnemanniana Matritense o lo cotizado de sus honorarios médicos en la atención de las clases aristocráticas (vamos que debió hacerse de oro, aparte de ennoblecerse). En una esquina del jardín, pegado a la verja, ha sido restaurado el cuadro de los últimos médicos que pasaron consulta en el hospital.

Pasamos a ver el segundo de los edificios de arquitectura neomudéjar, el llamado palacete del Marqués de los Salados, obra de Emilio Rodriguez Ayuso (1845-1891), el autor de la Escuelas Aguirre, construido para residencia del marqués, Joaquin Nuñez Pernía, entre los años 1878 y 1880. La similitud de apellidos con el fundador del Instituto merece una explicación que diría el alcalde de Villar del Río. El solar donde se edificó este palacete fue adquirido por Pedro Nuñez Pernía, hermano del marques de Núñez (José Núñez Pernía), dos años después de que este falleciera en 1879. Este Pedro Nuñez Pernía era obispo de Coria y ex senador del Reino por la diócesis de Toledo. A su muerte legó este solar a otro hermano suyo Joaquin Núñez Pernía, marqués de los Salados, que fue quien encargó al arquitecto citado la construcción de la vivienda familiar. Todavía la dinastía de los Nuñez Pernía continua con los hijos del anterior, José Nuñez Granés, segundo marques de los Salados, Carlos Nuñez Granés, medico y abogado y Pedro Nuñez Granes “notabilísimo ingeniero y urbanista madrileño con muy importantes responsabilidades en el Ayuntamiento de Madrid en el primer tercio del siglo XX”[6]. El Palacete fue adquirido por la Fundación a su propietario el 17 de noviembre de 1892

El edificio, tal como hoy se encuentra, un tanto dejado, a la espera de la “mano de nieve” que lo rehabilite, es todavía una obra interesante, muy poco conocida de los madrileños, con un notable diseño exterior en ladrillo fino con incrustaciones de cantería berroqueña en los zócalos, madera en los aleros y una importante labor de forja en balcones y en el mirador principal (del mismo arquitecto puede ser la verja exterior del recinto).
En el interior, la pieza más sobresaliente es su patio central cubierto con un lucernario de estructura metálica y cristal que proporciona una buena iluminación natural a las habitaciones.


En este edificio se ha acoplado el Museo Homeopático, instalado en tres salas, y en cuyas colecciones se refleja la historia de la Homeopatía, del hospital y la huella de las personas que allí trabajaron (cuadros, libros, objetos, documentos). Habría que recorrerlo despacio para apreciar sus detalles, pero no puedo por menos de referirme a la “joya” pictórica del Museo, instalada en la galería del segundo piso del espacio central, que es un cuadro, muy oscuro, con muy poca visibilidad, pendiente de restauración del “fa presto” Lucas Jordán y que representa "La muerte de San José".

Este Museo por lo que entiendo, se ha venido haciendo, en parte con aportaciones de los descendientes de los médicos homeópatas (uno de ellos es el escritor y académico José Luis Sampedro, emparentado con los Pellicer por su primer matrmonio con Isabel Pellicer Iturrioz, bisnieta del Dr. Tomás Pellicer) que han cedido o donado cuadros, libros y recuerdos de sus ascendientes.
No me queda mas que decir, amiga/o , que has aguantado hasta aquí la lectura de esta larga entrada, que, si tienes algún tiempo libre, gires una visita a este Hospital tan entrañablemente unido durante mas de un siglo a la vida del barrio. Allí serás afablemente acogido (la visita es gratuita), amenamente ilustrado y podrás captar otros matices que, posiblemente, se me hayan escapado o pasado desapercibidos.

NOTAS

[1] Es interesante también la consulta a la página de la Fundación Instituto Homeopático y Hospital San José HI http://www.homeoint.org/site/sanjose/index.htm
[2] Samuel Hahnemann publicó en 1796 su trabajo “Ensayo sobre un nuevo principio para descubrir el poder curativo de las drogas”.
[3] José Núñez Pernía nació en Benavente (Zamora) en 1805. Recibió una esmerada educación, siguiendo estudios eclesiásticos en el seminario de Sahagún y de leyes en la Universidad de Valladolid. En 1826 es nombrado arcediano de Rivas del Sil y ordenado de primera tonsura. En 1830 era secretario del cabildo de Astorga donde ejercía también de abogado. Parece que tuvo veleidades carlistas por lo que emigró a Francia. Allí encauzo su vocación por la medicina y conoció la obra de Samuel Hahnemann “Materia médica” llegando a dominarla. En Burdeos, donde trató gratuitamente a numerosos enfermos españoles con la nueva práctica terapéutica, fue acusado de intrusismo, siendo condenado por un tribunal, que reconoció la realidad de las curaciones, a pagar dos francos de multa, por carecer de titulo profesional, pero confiriéndole el título honorífico de doctor en Medicina con derecho a ejercer en toda Francia. Regresó a España en 1844, graduándose en la Facultad de Medicina de Madrid y obteniendo el título de Doctor en Medicina en la Universidad de Barcelona. El 1 de noviembre de 1845 constituyó, con otros médicos, la Sociedad Hahnemanniana Matritense, de la que salió elegido presidente. Impulsó la publicación desde 1846, del "Boletín de la Sociedad Hahnemannian"a, sustituido cinco años mas tarde por la revista “Anales de la Medicina Homeopática” y a su vez, remplazada esta, en 1860, por “El criterio médico”. En las tres publicó artículos doctrinales, presentó casos clínicos de su propia práctica, discursos y resúmenes de las discusiones habidas en la Sociedad. En 1864 publicó su experiencia patogénica mas conocida “Estudio médico del veneno de la tarántula hispánica”. Obtuvo grandes éxitos y honores en Exposiciones y Congresos Homeopáticos extranjeros (Filadelfia, París, Burdeos) y fue distinguido en Francia, donde fue autorizado en 1847 para ejercer la medicina, con el diploma de la Legión de Honor. Fue médico particular de la reina Isabel II y del infante don Sebastián y condecorado con las órdenes de Carlos III y de la Beneficencia. En 1865 recibió el título de marqués de Núñez. Fue además senador del Reino. En su testamento legó tres millones de reales en títulos para que sus rentas se destinasen a sostener el hospital y el instituto homeopático. Siguiendo su voluntad su cuerpo fue enterrado en hospital el 10 de noviembre de 1879.
[4] José Segundo de Lema, discípulo de Viollet le Duc, puede inscribirse en el estilo ecléctico que une elementos racionalistas con un fondo tradicional gótico-mudéjar. En Madrid hay varias obras suyas: la Real Fábrica de Tapices, el palacio Zabalburu, el Real Colegio e Iglesia de Loreto y la decoración interior de varias estancias en el Palacio Real. En el monasterio de El Escorial fue autor del panteón de Infantes.
[Nota nueva] "Desde la fundación del Instituto -escribe el cronista de Madrid Pedro de Répide en los años veinte del pasado siglo- hasta la fecha no ha decaido el número de concurrentes a su asistencia por la curación por el procedimiento de la homeopatía. Que desde luego tiene la ventaja de no molestar al enfermo y de ser sencillo, limpio y, por lo menos, inofensivo" (Pedro de Répide "Las calles de Madrid" Afrodisio Aguado, 4ª edición, 1981, pág. 229)
[5] Rafael Fraguas. “El paciente curado de Chamberí” El País 8 de julio de 2008.
[6] Véase “Palacete del marques de los Salados” en la página web del hospital.

Autor: Manuel Martínez Bargueño.
Fuente: Manuelblas.Madrid